One of the courses I am teaching this term is on art and patronage during the Renaissance, and as part of my background reading in preparation I read Christopher Hibbert's The Medici - as always with Hibbert it is a very readable presentation of his topic.
From this I learned, among many other things, that Michelangelo's statue of David of 1501-04, originally had the hair and the sling gilded, which somewhat changes the standard impression of the sculpture that we have. It has become such an immediately recognizable image, that imagining it looking in any way different, other than in jest, seems slightly odd. I can imagine that in its ioriginal location and so gilded it would have been even more striking, especially to contemporaries when it was first installed in 1504.
Image:vlsi.colorado.edu/~rbloem/david.html
Image: www.artchive.com
Michelangelo's figure is a serious, purposeful young man. David as depicted in marble, and more famously in bronze, by Donatello is more ambiguous - in the case of the bronze figure he is arguably the most depraved young man in western art. With young men like that on the streets of Florence it is little wonder that the city got the reputation it had for same-sex attraction...
There is an interesting online article about that aspect of the culture which produced Donatello's bronze of David here.
Michelangelo's figure is a serious, purposeful young man. David as depicted in marble, and more famously in bronze, by Donatello is more ambiguous - in the case of the bronze figure he is arguably the most depraved young man in western art. With young men like that on the streets of Florence it is little wonder that the city got the reputation it had for same-sex attraction...
There is an interesting online article about that aspect of the culture which produced Donatello's bronze of David here.
No comments:
Post a Comment