I was pleased to hear on the radio last night that the High Court has ruled that there is no case for intervention in the matter of interring the remains of King Richard III in Leicester cathedral. Given that he has lain in the city since 1485, although lost from the 1530s until a couple of years ago, it seemed a perversely sentimental idea to move him now to York. In that sense he should now be left in peace - though whether he is out of Purgatory is presumably beyond the competance of the High Court or the Plantagenet Alliance
William Shakespeare, Liturgist
-
The liturgical rearrangement—or in Peter Kwasniewski’s somewhat more
colorful description, the liturgical bloodbath—that recently occurred in
Tyler, Texas,...
1 hour ago
2 comments:
Full judgement here:
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/richard-3rd-judgment-.pdf
worth reading.
Kind regards
John
As you say, a sensible decision. The clamour for him to be reburied in York, in so far as it wasn't to do with tourism (which is why Leicester has been so keen to hang on to him) was mostly orchestrated by people who regard him as a much-maligned hero as opposed to a particularly ruthless medieval monarch. They seem to have the strange idea that finding his bones has in some way vindicated him and I was told in all seriousness by one woman (it's always women) that because 'Tudor propaganda' was wrong about the exact nature of his deformity that showed that everything negative said about him was wrong.
Members of the 'Plantagenet Alliance' seem remarkably insouciant about the fact that he executed their x17 or whatever great-grandfather, his brother-in-law Sir Thomas St Leger.
Post a Comment