I have posted about him before. My 2010 article, which includes a number of online links, can be accessed at The Flying Monk
Earlier this year research based on what is recorded of his actions and observations by the great twelfth century chronicler based at the abbey, William of Malmesbury argued that Eilmer had anticipated Edmund Halley* six centuries later in forecasting the 76 year return of what we know as Halley’s Comet.
This argument is summarised and set out in an article published last January in Phys.org which can be read at Halley's Comet wrongly named: 11th-century English monk predates British astronomer
However Medievalists.net now has an article based on one on that old stalwart Notes and Queries which suggests that Eilmer had not seen Halley’s Comet twice, but another comet early in the eleventh century. If he was younger than has hitherto thought then his famous flight would have taken place a few years later than has been thought.
This new interpretation, with a link to the new argument, can be read at When Did a Medieval Monk First Try to Fly? New Study Reopens the Debate
Whichever is right is probably unknowable with absolute certainty, but what surely emerges from the story of Eilmer is that eleventh century English Benedictines had serious scientific and astronomical interests, and anticipated experimental science.
* Pronounced ”Hawley”, not “Hallé”
What a shame WIlmer didn't have the common sense to try out his flying contraption first by flying or gliding down a steep hill, nor his abbot by giving him consent to leap off a tower only subject to successfully completing that preliminary test.
ReplyDeleteGoogle AI says there are several such hills within easy reach of Malmesbury, not least the hill on which the town itself sits! Also, it is only little over 20 miles from Cooper's Hill, the precipitously steep hill where the famous annual cheese rolling competition is held!
Cheers
John Ramsden (jrq@gmx.com)